Freddie Flintoff probably Englands most naturally talented cricketer for a generation has got himself into all sorts of problems from his widely reported drinking escapades at the cricket world cup.
This in turn has sparked off a debate about whither his losing the vice-captaincy and missing one game was an over reaction to this incident. There were the obligatory phone ins on Radio 5, with many callers saying that the authorities had overreacted.
I beg to differ with this view, for it bolsters the view that getting drunk is a socially acceptable thing to do. Yet the UK and Scotland in particular has a growing problem with alcohol. In 2004 there were 8,221 alcohol-related deaths in the UK, almost double the 1991 total of 4,144. That is a staggering rise in just 13 years! If the UK picture is bleak then the Scottish context is even worse. The area I live in, Glasgow, had the highest alcohol-related death rate among both men and women in 1998 - 2004. Fifteen of the 20 UK local areas with the highest male alcohol-related death rates were in Scotland, 14 of the top 20 for women. Two out of three 16 - 24 year old males in Scotland drank more than twice the recommended daily benchmarks [Scottish health survey 1998].
Getting drunk is no laughing matter, especially as for most people this is not an unforeseen consequence of a "good night out", but is the object of the night out as for many the attitude exists that unless you get drunk you cannot have a good time.
I hope Freddie is truly sorry, I hope he gets help as his over drinking seems to be a feature of his lifestyle. I hope he does not become crickets George Best. More than this I hope that as a nation we can change our relationship to alcohol.
REport on Alcohol Related Deaths Health Stats Spring 2007 Stats on alcohol in Scotland Binge Drinking Costing Billions
I recall being ina London Chaplains' meeting, when one chaplain tried to start a conversation about the drinking culture amongst undergraduates. He was, literally, shouted down with laughter. The usual lines about students letting off steam, experimenting and so on were hauled out and he was not taken seriously.
But I think he had a point and my feeling at the time was that part of why he wasn't taken seriously was because, in part, the church in the UK is reticent to speak out against its own culture of drinking.
Having grown up in Australia I've seen a fair bit of recreational drinking to oblivion. But, to be honest, it is far less common to see people my age, in Australia, especially people with lots of social advantages to their name, getting blotto on a regular basis.
I heard a lot of sermons during my years in the UK, more than a few one social ills and problems, but never one on sobriety. Is it fair to say its a problem the church tends not to speak out about?
Posted by: f | Tuesday, March 20, 2007 at 11:48 AM
Fernando - In my experiance there was quite a differance between the attitude of churches in Scotland and England over this matter, at least in evangelical circles.
This has changed in the past 15 years, so now drinking has become more acceptable in the Scottish context.
That said I can't remember hearing the issue addressed at all in any sermons I've heard say in the last 10 years! That said it's an issue we reguarly deal with in youth work.
Posted by: brodie | Tuesday, March 20, 2007 at 12:54 PM
Brodie - thanks for this post. this is obviously something that is an issue here in Ireland as well. It is such an ingrained part of the culture that it is almost a hands-off topic at any level. It doesn't help that Guiness is the largest export the country offers, and the romanticizing that comes with it. anyway, thanks for the food for thought...
Posted by: Brad | Thursday, March 22, 2007 at 07:59 AM
Brad - Your right to point out the similarities between Scotland and Ireland. You have Guiness, we have Whisky. What I think has changed in our cultures is that we have moved from a culture where drinking was part of socialising to where getting drunk is what it's all about. Gone are the days when people would go out and sit with the one pint all night and at a push have a second.
So I think we can be counter-cultural without advocating abstinence, although in certain contexts this is perhaps the better option. I try to encourage the young people I work with who are of a drinking age to set a limit of what they will drink in a night out that they know is below what would get them drunk. We probably also need to help our young people think about the wider issues of drinking safely, i.e. how to avoid getting you drink spikes, how to avoid fights etc.
Posted by: Brodie | Thursday, March 22, 2007 at 09:26 AM
It's a good Q, was it for freddie getting drunk, or for his behaviour that being drunk caused him to do [with all the embarassment generated] or how it was likely to effect his performance on the pitch and off it as a role model/leader? Or all of the above?
I wonder if being drunk gets less coverage in churches because in some way most people who are in church have been drunk before? Maybe that collective we've been there is not helping the people who continually go there - and indeed whether it is an addiction that has maybe less to do with alcohol and more to do with self image, sex or something else. So we treat the symptom but not the cause?
Posted by: Paul | Thursday, March 22, 2007 at 11:03 AM
Paul - Interesting point about treating the symptom but not the cause.
I wonder as well if we talk so little in our churches about issues like this because we're scared to seeming legalistic, we're scared of being different?
Posted by: Brodie | Friday, March 23, 2007 at 11:43 AM