I'm becoming frustrated by what often passes for worship. This is not particularly a get at what we sing at the church I'm part of, cause were just singing what most other "evangelical" churches in the UK do. The cause of my frustration is the me centeredness of so many of our songs, and now I'm frustrated by it I also find myself being more sensitive to it.
On Sunday just past we sang a song - nice tune, ok words for the most part, but there was a bit that spoke of Jesus dying on the cross and then had the line, "he took the fall, and thought of me, above all else". I just couldn't sing it. Now none of us can say for sure what Jesus was thinking as he hung on the cross - his sayings from the cross perhaps give us some indication, but a scant one at that. What I think I can say with a degree of certainty is that he was not hanging their thinking about me!
"Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it". Matt 10 :39, seems to have been lost on us, as we seem determined in much that passes for Christian discipleship and worship to prove this saying of Jesus wrong.
Sorry to rant a bit, but hey if what were really doing is worshiping ourselves and not God, is that not idolatry, is that not something worth getting upset about?
If you haven't already, it's worth reading Brian McLaren's "Open letter to worship songwriters" here:
http://www.emergentvillage.com/Site/Resource/Downloads/index.htm
and the postscript from John Mortensen too.
It's good stuff - especially because it offers some possible ways forward out of this "all about me" sort of worship.
Posted by: Anneke | Monday, March 21, 2005 at 09:26 PM
also check out 'worshipping trinity' by robin parry - a great antidote for a lot of what tries to pass as christian worship!
Posted by: andy goodliff | Monday, March 21, 2005 at 09:34 PM
Andy and Anneke, thanks for your comments, especially the link to McLaren's open letter. I heard him speak in London in December and he said then that he'd met with some UK songwriters and challenged them about the content of their songs, but it's good to have his letter. I think I'll pass it on to the worship guys here.
Posted by: Brodie | Tuesday, March 22, 2005 at 10:07 AM
Excellent post, valid concerns. I'll be writing about your post on my blog later today. Peace, brother.
Posted by: Milton Stanley | Wednesday, March 23, 2005 at 06:34 PM
Good post - you're expressing something about that song that I've tried to (http://levesons.blogspot.com/2005/02/songs-as-musicianworship-leader.html) - but you do it better!
Posted by: Pete | Thursday, March 24, 2005 at 12:38 PM
We were learning about this in our class at the U of G.
Once the lecturer had made me aware of the different type of things we do in worship, I can't but help notice that all to often we can fall into the trap of being self-centred in worship rather than self-sacrificing. But, I guess the good thing is that we are now aware of what we are doing and can make attempts to actually worship God rather than anything else.
Posted by: Dougie Lochhead | Thursday, March 24, 2005 at 04:27 PM
I came across your blog post on this while doing some research on this topic myself. I've just come back from our yearly church camp, and we sang this song. We've sung it before, but for some reason this time the last line grabbed me and I thought, "Hey, now, that's not right!".
I'm in the process of putting my thoughts together, but my initial response is that Jesus was not thinking of "me above all" - rather his death on the cross was primarly about the Father and bringing him glory. The line in the song is kind of reminiscent to me of the idea that God created us because he *needed* someone to love, rather than (what I think is biblical) the fact that God created us to demonstrate his glory.
Posted by: Gabriel Hauber | Tuesday, March 29, 2005 at 05:35 AM
I had heard 'Above All' and never thought about it in the 'me-centered' way. It seemed to me more to highlight His selflessness, but maybe you are right.
I've written a short article on 'worship with substance' which I think gets to the heart of the issue. If you are interested:
http://www.bamboobell.squarespace.com/contemporary-vs-traditional/
Posted by: Rick | Tuesday, March 29, 2005 at 10:57 AM
I have disliked that song for a couple of years now because of that last lyric. I am in a new position at a church as of January, and I have recently found out how much some people love the song. When explaining to my pastor, why I disliked it he agreed with me. However, I find the rest of lyrics very Christ honoring so I think I will take the legal risk and change the lyrics (please don't tell CCLI) and explain to our flock why we do so.
I was trying to find out if anyone else has used the song with an altered lyric which is what led me to find these comments. So, how about this for a final lyric?
"Like a rose trampled on the ground, You took the fall, God raised You up above all."
I am tempted to disregard that lyric as not precise enough regarding the trinity. However, using "God" when you mean "The Father" didn't seem to be a big deal to Paul in some places.
So there's my two cents.
-Andy Johnson
A Washington Worship Pastor
Posted by: Andy Johnson | Wednesday, April 20, 2005 at 01:15 AM